BN · rank #6 · 2026-10-23
ENR
XETRA · EUR · $116.67B (USD)
The exact numbers the algorithm saw.
| Composite score Z-score blend of the factors below; drives the rank. | 0.14 |
|---|---|
| Forward revenue growth Consensus forward revenue growth. | +14.6% |
| Forward net margin Consensus forward net margin. | +7.8% |
| Net margin TTM Trailing twelve month net margin. | +6.4% |
| Margin expansion Forward minus trailing net margin (percentage points). | +1.3% |
| Forward PEG Forward P/E to growth. Below 1 is cheap for the growth. | 0.40 |
| Debt / FCF Net debt relative to free cash flow. Lower is safer. | 0.39× |
| Analyst upside Spread between the consensus 12m target and the current price. | +58.4% |
| Last EPS surprise Most recent reported EPS versus consensus. | +10% |
| Market cap (USD) | $116.67B |
The AI research card
Independent qualitative review of each pick before the order is placed. On the rare day the research service is unavailable, the paper book trades on the quant ranking alone and no card appears here.
Summary
Siemens Energy is a global power-technology conglomerate whose Grid Technologies division manufactures large power transformers, HVDC systems, and high-voltage switchgear that are structurally undersupplied relative to grid-modernization and data-center demand.
Rationale
The €162 billion backlog (covering ~87% of FY2027 expected revenue), 28% YoY Grid Technologies order growth, a 1.57 book-to-bill, and a 0.41 forward PEG collectively confirm ENR is a genuine, revenue-visible bottleneck solver—not a sentiment trade—exactly the profile this strategy targets.
Material risks
- 1Capacity expansion by Hitachi Energy, GE Vernova, and Hyundai Electric could erode transformer/HVDC lead-time scarcity and pricing power within the backlog's multi-year delivery window, directly undermining the bottleneck moat before orders convert to margin.
- 2Siemens Gamesa remains a structural drag and execution wildcard; a return to losses or further turbine-quality charges could absorb management bandwidth and capital, diluting the Grid Technologies thesis at the consolidated P&L level.
AI verdict council
Each pick is reviewed independently by 3 models before any order. 3 of 3 voted to proceed.